Guide

What a website audit is, and whether you need one

5 min readLast reviewed

'Website audit' is used to mean anything from a two-minute automated scan to a fortnight of consultancy, which makes it hard to know what you are being offered or whether the price is fair.

This is a plain description of what the term covers, written by people who sell one — so read the last section first if you would rather start with the part where we say what we cannot do.

What an audit usually covers

A reasonably complete audit looks at six areas. Most tools cover two or three and call it an audit, which is worth knowing before comparing prices.

Search
Whether search engines can find, read and index your pages, and whether anything is actively stopping them. The largest group on most sites, because it is where most sites lose the most and almost none of it is visible by looking at your own home page.
Speed
How long the page takes to become useful, measured on a mid-range phone rather than an office desktop. The desktop number flatters almost every site.
Security
Whether the site is configured the way a secure site should be — HTTPS enforced, a valid certificate, the response headers browsers look for. Not a penetration test.
Accessibility
Whether people using screen readers, keyboards or magnification can use the site. Automated testing covers roughly a third of this; the rest needs a person.
Email trust
Whether somebody can send email pretending to be your domain. Invisible from the website, genuinely damaging when wrong, and almost never checked.
AI crawlers
Whether AI tools may read your site, and whether you point them at your best content. New, and worth deciding deliberately rather than by accident.

Automated scan or manual review?

They answer different questions and the distinction is worth holding on to.

An automated scan is good at everything countable and comparable: which pages are missing titles, how long the server took, which images have no alt text, whether a header is present. It is fast, it is cheap, it is consistent, and it can be repeated to show whether a fix worked. It cannot tell you whether your pricing page is confusing, whether your booking form asks for too much, or whether your content answers the question people actually have.

A manual review is the opposite. It is slow and expensive and it is the only thing that answers those questions.

The sensible order is a scan first. It costs little, and it removes the mechanical problems so that any manual review you pay for is spent on judgement rather than on a person reading out a list a machine could have produced.

How to tell a useful report from a sales document

There are a few reliable signals, and they are easy to check before you pay anything.

It shows its evidence
A finding should name the pages affected and show what was actually observed. 'Your site has performance issues' is a sales line. 'This image is 2400px wide and displayed at 400px, on this page' is a finding.
It says what it did not check
Any honest report has gaps — a collector that could not run, a section that needs a person. A report with no gaps is a report that is not telling you about its gaps.
It distinguishes urgent from tidy
A list of ninety issues sorted by nothing in particular is easy to generate and impossible to act on. What you need is which three things to do first and why.
It tells you what a fix is worth
Not a made-up revenue figure, but an honest account of what the problem costs — visitors leaving, pages not indexed, a form nobody can complete.
You can act on it without the person who wrote it
A report whose recommendations all require hiring its author is a proposal wearing a report's clothes.

When you probably do not need one

If your website is a single page with your phone number on it and it loads quickly, an audit will tell you very little. Spend the time on getting reviews instead.

If you already know what is wrong and have not fixed it, another report will not help. This is more common than it sounds — most businesses that commission an audit already suspect the answer.

And if the site is about to be replaced, audit the new one rather than the old one.

The times it is genuinely worth it: traffic has dropped and you do not know why; the site was built by somebody you no longer work with; you are about to spend money on advertising and want to know the destination works; or nobody has looked at it properly in two years and you would rather find the problems than be told about them by a customer.

Find out where your site stands

Everything described above is something the scanner looks for, with the evidence for each result on your own pages. Free, no account, first findings in about twenty-five seconds.

Scan my site

The checks behind this guide

Questions people also ask

Answered here in full, rather than as a teaser.

How much should a website audit cost?

An automated scan should be free or close to it — the marginal cost of running one is small, and anybody charging significantly for a scan alone is charging for the report layout. A manual review by an experienced person is a day or more of work and priced accordingly. Be wary of anything in between that is priced like consultancy and delivered like a scan.

How often should I audit my website?

After any significant change — a redesign, a platform migration, a new plugin — because that is when things break. Otherwise every six months is plenty for a small site. Continuous monitoring is worth it once the website is a meaningful part of how you get customers, because then the cost of a fault going unnoticed for a month is real.

Can I do a website audit myself?

Much of it, yes. Google Search Console is free and will tell you what Google thinks of your site. PageSpeed Insights is free and measures speed. Reading your own site on a phone, on mobile data, and trying to complete your own contact form using only the keyboard will find more than most people expect. A tool mainly saves you time and catches the things you would not think to look for.